Integral Linguistics from a Cognitive Semiotics perspective: Metaphor between semiotic and pre-semiotic experience
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55245/energeia.2025.05Keywords:
conceptual metaphor, Integral Linguistics, Cognitive Linguistics, Cognitive SemioticsAbstract
In recent years, Eugenio Coseriu’s linguistic theory has been increasingly re-evaluated within contemporary debates, particularly for its ambition to offer a unified and coherent framework for understanding human linguisticity. This paper examines the theoretical tension between Coseriu’s perspective and cognitive-semantic approaches, which often isolate cognitive mechanisms from their intrinsic semiotic and linguistic grounding. A paradigmatic case is Conceptual Metaphor Theory and its subsequent developments, which I take here as a litmus test to highlight the divergence between two ultimately irreconcilable conceptions of language. Convinced of the need to recover a philosophically consistent conception of language that transcends the limitations of mainstream Cognitive Linguistics and Cognitive Semantics, I will propose ways to sustain and expand the dialogue already underway between Coseriu’s theory of language and Cognitive Semiotics – both sharing critical motives toward the dominant cognitive paradigm. The aim is not to portray Coseriu as a forerunner of Cognitive Semiotics –nor, even less, to construct a “Coserian Cognitive Semiotics” – but rather to explore how Coseriu’s Integral Linguistics might enrich this emerging disciplinary field, suggesting that a dialogue with Coseriu can illuminate key theoretical issues and provide fertile ground for rethinking language (and semiosis) as a philosophical object in its own right.
References
Agud, Ana (2021): “Eugenio Coseriu’s approach to language and linguistics: building a ‘philosophically sustainable’ linguistics”, in Klaas Willems / Cristinel Muntenau 2021, 63-78.
Albrecht, Jörn (2015): “La Sémantique d’Eugenio Coseriu et ses sources épistémologiques dans la philosphie du langage”, in Gérard Christophe / Régis Missire 2015, 35-49.
Allen Harris, Randy (1993): The Linguistic Wars. Chomsky, Lakoff, and the Battle over the Deep Structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bartlett, Justin J. / Ruangjaroon, Sugunya (2022): “A War of Words: Dissecting the Foundational Claims of CMT”, Axiomathes 32 (Suppl. 2), 435-451.
Blank, Andreas / Koch, Peter (1999): Historical Semantics and Cognition. Berlin / New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 17-48.
Blomberg, Johan / Zlatev, Jordan (2021): “Metalinguistic relativity: Does one’s ontology determine one's view on linguistic relativity”, Language and communication, 76, 35-46.
Borcilă, Mircea (2021): “Integral Linguistics as a cultural science”, in Klaas Willems / Cristinel Muntenau 2021: 137-149.
Bota, Christian (2011): “Is Coseriu's Framework a ‘Cognitive’ One? Comments on Jordan Zlatev's Article ‘From Cognitive to Integral Linguistics and Back Again’”, Intellectica, 2/56, 315-319.
Brandt, Per Aage (2020): Cognitive Semiotics: Signs, Mind, and Meaning. London / New York: Bloomsbury Publishing.
Chomsky, Noam (1966): Cartesian Linguistic. A Charter in the History of Rationalist Thought. New York / London: Harper & Row.
Christophe, Gérard / Missire, Régis (2015): Eugenio Coseriu aujourd’hui. Linguistique et philosophie du langage. Limoges: Lambert-Lucas.
Coseriu, Eugenio (1952): Sistema, Norma y Habla, Montevideo (also in Teoría del lenguaje y Lingüística general. Cinco estudios, Madrid: Gredos, 11-113, 3rd ed. 1973).
Coseriu, Eugenio (1956): La creación metaforica en el lenguaje, Montevideo (Italian translation: “La creazione metaforica nel linguaggio”, in Eugenio Coseriu 2007, 121-154).
Coseriu, Eugenio (1967): “Der Mensch und seine Sprache”, in von H. Haag / E.P. Möhres (eds), Ursprung und Wesen des Menschen, Tübingen, 67-79 (Italian translation: “L’Uomo e il suo linguaggio”, in Eugenio Coseriu 2007: 51-69).
Coseriu, Eugenio (1968): “Les structures lexématiques”, Probleme der Semantik, Wiesbaden, 3-16.
Coseriu, Eugenio (1975): “Gli universali linguistici e gli altri”, in L. Heilmann / E. Rigotti (eds), La Linguistica: aspetti e problemi. Bologna: Il Mulino, 377-413.
Coseriu, Eugenio (1980): “Interdisciplinarietà e linguaggio”, in Giogio Braga / Valentino Braintenberg / Carlo Cipolli / Eugenio Coseriu / Stefano Crepi-Reghizzi / Jacques Mehler / Renzo Titone, L’accostamento intrdisciplinare allo studio del linguaggio, Franco Angeli: Milano (also in Eugenio Coseriu 2007, 243-268).
Coseriu, Eugenio (1982): “Au-delà du structuralisme”, in: Moll Marquès, Aina (ed.): XVI Congrés Internacional de Lingüistica [i] Filologia Romàniques (Palma de Mallorca 7-12/04/1980), Actes, I, Sessions plenàries i taules rodones, Palma de Mallorca: Moll, 163-168.
Coseriu, Eugenio (1985) “Linguistic Competence: What Is It Really?”, The Modern Language Review, 80/ 4, xxv-xxx.
Coseriu, Eugenio (1990): “Semántica estructural y semántica cognitiva”, Profesor Francisco Marsá, Jurnadad de Filología. Universitad de Barcelona, 239-282 (English Translation: Klaas Willems / Torsten Leuschner (2000): “Structural Semantics and ‘Cognitive’ Semantics”, Logos and Language: Journal of General Linguistics and Language Theory, 1, Tübingen: Narr, 19-42).
Coseriu, Eugenio (1992): “Zeichen, Symbol, Wort”, in Zur Philosophie des Zeichens. Berlin / New York: De Gruyter, 3-27 (Italian translation: “Segno, simbolo, parola”, in Eugenio Coseriu 2007, 219-241).
Coseriu, Eugenio (1994): “My Pagliaro”, in Tullio De Mauro / Lia Formigari, Italian Studies in Linguistic Historiography. Münster: Nodus Publikationen, 39-44.
Coseriu, Eugenio (1995): “My Saussure”, in Tullio De Mauro / Shigeaki Sugeta, Saussure and Linguistics Today. Roma: Bulzoni, 187-191.
Coseriu, Eugenio (1997), Linguistica del testo. Roma: Carocci.
Coseriu, Eugenio (2001): “Le langage: diacriticon tes ousias. Dix thèses à propos de l’essence du langage et du signifié”, in Dominique Keller / Jean Pierre Durafour / Jean François P. Bonnot / Rudolf Stock (eds.), Percevoir: monde et langage. Invariance et variabilité du sens vécu. Sprimont: Mardaga Pierre, 79-83 (Italian translation: “Dieci tesi a proposito dell’essenza del linguaggio e del significato”, in Coseriu 2007: 161-166).
Coseriu, Eugenio (2007): Il linguaggio e l’uomo attuale. Saggi di filosofia del linguaggio. Verona: Fondazione Centro Studi Campostrini.
Coseriu, Eugenio (2019), Storia della filosofía del linguaggio. Roma: Carocci.
Daddessio, Thomas C. (1995): Of Minds and Symbols. Berlin / New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Damasio, Antonio R. (1994): Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain. New York: G.P. Putnam.
Danesi, Marcel (1993): Vico, Metaphor, and the Origin of Language. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Danesi, Marcel (1995): Giambattista Vico and Anglo-american Science. Berlin / New York: de Gruyter-Mouton.
De Mauro, Tullio (1965): Introduzione alla semantica. Roma-Bari: Laterza.
De Mauro, Tullio (1982): Minisemantica dei linguaggi non verbali e delle lingue. Roma-Bari: Laterza.
De Palo, Marina / Gensini, Stefano (2018): Saussure e la Scuola linguistica romana. Da Antonino Pagliaro a Tullio De Mauro. Roma: Carocci.
Devylder, Simon & Zlatev, Jordan (2020): “Cutting and breaking metaphors of the self and the Motivation & Sedimentation Model”, in Annalisa Baicchi (ed.), Figurative meaning construction in thought and language. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 253-281.
Di Cesare, Donatella (1997): “Introduzione”, in Eugenio Coseriu 1997: 11-19.
Di Cesare, Donatella (2019): “Coseriu e la domanda filosofica sul linguaggio”, in Eugenio Coseriu 2019, 13-23.
Di Paolo, Ezequiel A. / Cuffari, Elena C. / De Jaegher, Hanne (2018): Linguistic Bodies: The Continuity Between Life and Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Diodato, Filomena (2020): “The embodiment of language: sign function and semiotic threshold”, RIFL (2019) SFL, 203-215.
Diodato, Filomena (2021): “Why Semantics Cannot Be but Cognitive. Coseriu’s Criticism of Cognitive Semantics”, in Filomena Diodato (ed.), Il linguaggio e le lingue: tra teoria e storia. Atti del I Convegno Cispels, Roma 17-19 Sett. 2018. Roma: Aracne, 387-408.
Diodato, Filomena (2022): “The Botanist and the Gardner”, in Marina De Palo / Stefano Gensini (eds). With Saussure, beyond Saussure. Between Linguistics and Philosophy of Language. Munich: Nodus, 114-131.
Diodato, Filomena (2024a): “Rethinking lexical semantic fields: relevance and local holism”, Semiotica, 260, 153-177.
Diodato, Filomena (2024b): “La simbolicità del linguaggio nel dibattito tra grammatica universale e grammatica cognitiva”, Blityri, XIII (1-2), 355-370.
Eco, Umberto (1976): A theory of Semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Eco, Umberto (1984): Semiotica e Filosofia del Linguaggio. Torino: Einaudi.
Eco, Umberto / Paci, Chris (1983): “The Scandal of Metaphor: Metaphorology and Semiotics”. Poetics Today, 4, 217-257.
Faur, Elena (2013): “Integral Semantics and Conceptual Metaphor: Rethinking Conceptual Metaphor within an Integral Semantics Framework”, Cognitive Semiotics 5 (1-2), 108-139.
Faur, Elena (2021): “The crux of metaphor: between Cognitive and Integral Linguistics”, in Klaas Willems / Cristinel Munteanu, 2021: 311-226.
Foolen, Ad (2023): “Linguistic Feeling in Real Life and in Linguistics”, in David Romand / Michel Le Du, 267-299.
Formigari, Lia (2007): Introduzione alla filosofia delle lingue, Roma-Bari: Laterza.
Gallese, Vittorio / Lakoff, George (2005): “The brain’s concepts: The role of the sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge”, Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22, 455-479.
Garroni, Emilio (1977): Ricognizione della semiotica. Roma: Officina edizioni.
Geckeler, Horst (1971), Strukturelle Semantik und Wortfeldtheorie. Monaco: Wilhelm Fink.
Gensini, Stefano (2014-2015): “La metáfora viquiana y la ciencia cognitiva: un problema de filosofía del lenguaje”, Cuadernos sobre Vico, 28/29, 33-51.
Gibbs, Raymond W. Jr. (2017): Metaphor Wars: Conceptual Metaphors in Human Life. Cambridge University Press.
Gibbs, Raymond W. Jr. / Colston, Herbert L. (2012): Interpreting figurative meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Grady, Joseph E. (1997): Foundations of meaning: primary metaphors and primary scenes. University of California.
Hjelmslev, Louis (1943): Omkring Sprogteoriens Grundlæggelse. Kopenhagen: Munksgaard (revisited English edition: Prolegomena to a Theory of Language, Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press, 1963).
Humboldt, von W. (1836): Über die Verschiedenheit des menschlichen Sprachbaues und ihren Einfluss auf die geistige Entwicklung des Menschengeschlechts. Berlin: Dümmler (Italian translation by Donatella di Cesare: La Diversità delle Lingue. Roma-Bari: Laterza, 1991).
Johnson, Mark (2018): The Aesthetics of Meaning and Thought: The Bodily Roots of Philosophy, Science, Morality, and Art. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kabatek, Johannes (2023): Eugenio Coseriu: Beyond Structuralism. Berlin / Boston: De Gruyter.
Kabatek, Johannes / Murguía, Adolfo (1997): “Die Sachen sagen, wie sie sind…” Eugenio Coseriu im Gespräch. Tübingen: Narr (Spanish translation: “Decir las cosas como son…”. Conversaciones con Eugenio Coseriu, Sevilla: Universidad de Sevilla, 2021).
Kövecses, Zoltán, (2020): Extended conceptual metaphor theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lakoff, George (1987): Women, fire and dangerous things. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Lakoff, George (2008), “The neural theory of metaphor”, in Raymond W. Gibbs (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 17-38.
Lakoff, George (2014): “Mapping the brain's metaphor circuitry: Metaphorical thought in everyday reason”, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, Article 958 https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00958 (last accessed September 20, 2025)
Lakoff, George / Johnson, Mark (1980): Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, George / Johnson, Mark (1999): Philosophy in the flesh: the embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. New York: Basic Books.
Lakoff, George / Mark Turner (1992): More Than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Langacker, Ronald W. (1991), Concept, Image, and Symbol. The Cognitive Basis of Grammar. Berlin / New York: Mouton De Gruyter.
Leezenberg, Michiel (2009): “From Cognitive Linguistics to Social Science: Thirty Years after Metaphors We Live By”, Cognitive Semiotics, vol. 5, no. 1-2, 140-152.
Legrenzi, Paolo / Umiltà, Carlo (2009), Neuro-mania. Il cervello non spiega chi siamo. Bologna: il Mulino.
Pagliaro, Antonino (1930): Sommario di linguistica arioeuropea, Fascicolo I: Cenni storici e questioni teoriche (also in Antonino Pagliaro, Storia della linguistica. Tomo I. Sommario di linguistica arioeuropea. Palermo: Novecento 1993).
Pennisi, Antonino (1987): La linguistica dei mercatanti. Filosofia linguistica e filosofia civile da Vico a Cuoco. Napoli: Guida Editore.
Prieto, Luis J. (1975): Pertinence et pratique: essai de sémiologie. Paris: Editions de minuit.
Rakova, Marina (2002): “The philosophy of embodied realism: A high price to pay?”, Cognitive Linguistics, vol. 13(3), 215-244.
Romand, David (2023): “Introduction. Linguistic Feeling: Revisiting a Concept Between Linguistics, Philosophy of Language, and Affective Science”, in David Romand / Michel Le Du 2023: 1-72.
Romand, David / Le Du, Michel (2023): Emotions, Metacognition, and the Intuition of Language Normativity. Theoretical, Epistemological, and Historical Perspectives on Linguistic Feeling, Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
Saussure, Ferdinand de (1916): Cours de linguistique générale. Lausanne-Paris: Payot (Italian translation: Corso di linguistica generale, ed. Tullio De Mauro. Roma-Bari: Laterza, 1967).
Simone, Raffaele (1995): Iconicity in Language. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Sonesson, Göran (2006): “The Meaning of Meaning in Biology and Cognitive Science: A Semiotic Reconstruction”, Sign Systems Studies, 34.1, 135-211.
Sonesson, Göran (2007), “From the Meaning of Embodiment to the Embodiment of Meaning: A Study in Phenomenological Semiotics”, in Tom Ziemke / Jordan Zlatev / Roslyn M. Frank, Body, Language and Mind, vol. 1: Embodiment. Berlin / New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 85-127.
Sonesson, Göran (2010): “Semiosis and the elusive final interpretant of understanding.” Semiotica, 179:1-4, 145-258.
Sonesson, Göran (2018): “New Reflections On The Problem(S) Of Relevance(S). The Return Of The Phenomena”, in Jan Strassheim / Hisashi Nasu, Relevance and Irrelevance: Theories, Factors and Challenges. Berlin / Boston: De Gruyter, 21-50.
Sonesson, Göran (2021): “The subtle art of integrating linguistics (and/or semiotics)”, in Klaas Willelms / Cristinel Munteanu, 2021: 151-164.
Tallis, Raymond (2011), Aping Mankind. Neuromania, Darwinitis and the misrepresentation of humanity. Durham (UK): Acumen.
Taylor, John R. (1999): “Cognitive Semantics and Structural Semantics”, in Andreas Blank / Peter Koch, 17-48.
Trabant, Jürgen (2021): “The essence of language: on Coseriu’s philosphy of language”, in Willems / Munteneau, 47-61.
Varela, Francisco / Thompson, Evan T. / Rosch, Eleanor (1991): The Embodied Mind. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
Vico, Giambattista (1744/1977), La Scienza Nuova (ed. Paolo Rossi). Milano: Rizzoli libri.
Vîlcu, Dina (2015), “Le statut épistémologique de la linguistique”, in Gérard Christophe / Régis Missire (eds.), 51-60.
Violi, Patrizia (2008): “Beyond the body: Towards a full embodied semiosis”, in Roslyn M. Frank / RenPé Dirven / Tom Ziemke / Enrique Bernárdez (eds.), Body, Language and Mind, Vol. 2: Sociocultural Situatedness. Berlin / New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 53-76.
Violi, Patrizia (2015): “Global and Local: Encyclopedic Meaning Revisited”, Semiotica, 206, 89-108.
Vîrban, Floarea (2015): “Origini dell’integralismo coseriano: indagando su una possibile matrice fenomenologica”, in Vincenzo Orioles / Raffaella Bombi (eds), Oltre Saussure. L’eredità scientifica di Eugenio Coseriu // Beyond Saussure. Eugenio Coseriu’s Scientific Legacy. Firenze: Cesati, 397-410.
Vîrban, Floarea (2022): “Language Change versus Language Non-change in Coseriu: The Peculiar Issue of Language Identity. Questioning an Eventual Resemblance to Locke’s Theory of Personal Identity”, in José Maria García Martín / Francisco Ruiz Fernández / Nuria Campos Carrasco / Benito Gutierrez Santaella (eds.), La historia de la lengua, la dialectología y el concepto de cambio lingüístico en el pensamiento de Eugenio Coseriu, Berlin / New York: Peter Lang, 177-204.
Wierzbicka, Anna (1986): “Metaphors linguists live by: Lakoff & Johnson contra Aristotle”, Paper in Linguistics, 19(2), 287-313.
Willems, Klaas / Munteanu, Cristinel (eds), Eugenio Coseriu. Past, Present and Future. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter.
Zlatev, Jordan (2009): “The semiotic hierarchy: Life, consciousness, signs, and language”, Cognitive Semiotics, 4, 169-200.
Zlatev, Jordan (2011), “From Cognitive to Integral Linguistics and Back Again”, Intellectica, 56/2, 125-147.
Zlatev, Jordan (2012): “Cognitive semiotics: An emerging field for the transdisciplinary study of meaning”, Public Journal of Semiotics, 4 (1), 2-24.
Zlatev, Jordan (2015): “Cognitive semiotics”, in Peter P. Trifonas (ed.), International Handbook of Semiotics. Dordrecht: Springer, 1043-1067.
Zlatev, Jordan (2018): “Meaning making from life to language: The semiotic hierarchy and Phenomenology”, Cognitive Semiotics, 11(1), https://doi.org/10.1515/cogsem-2018-0001 (last accessed September 20, 2025).
Zlatev, Jordan (in press), “Five pillars of cognitive semiotics”, in Amir Bilgari (ed.) Open Semiotics, Vol 5. Paris: Editions L’Harmattan.
Zlatev, Jordan / Blomberg, Johan (2019): “Norms of language. What kinds and where from? Insights from phenomenology”, in Aleksi Mäkilähde / Ville Leppänen / Esa Itkonen, Normativity in Language and Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 69-101.
Zlatev, Jordan / Jacobsson, Göran / Paju, Liina (2021): “Desiderata for metaphor theory, the Motivation & Sedimentation Model and motion-emotion metaphoremes”, in Augusto Soares da Silva (ed.), Figurative language: Intersubjectivity and usage. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 41-74.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Filomena Diodato
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
